Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29975


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10003051
Determination of Some Agricultural Characters of Developed Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Lines
Abstract:
This research was made during the 2015 growing periods in the trial filed of "Research Station for Department of Field Crops, Agricultural Faculty, Selcuk University" according to “Randomized Blocks Design” with 3 replications. Research material was the following pea lines; PS16, PS18, PS21, PS23, PS24, PS25, PS36, PS47, PS49, PS51, PS54, PS58, PS67, PS69, PS71, PS73, PS83, PS84, PS87 and PSKY and three cultivars and other 2 commercial varieties named as Bolero, Rondo and Ultrello. Some agronomical characteristics such as plant height (cm) number of pod per plant number of seed per pod number of seed per plant 100 seed weight (g) and seed yield (kg ha-1) were determined. The highest seed yield was obtained 2727.0 kg ha-1 in the PS71 line and the lowest value was obtained 1238.0 kg ha-1 in the commercial variety of Bolero. Results of the research implicated that the new developed lines were superior compared with the control (commercial) varieties by means of most of the characteristics. Nevertheless, similar researches should be continued in different locations and years.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] A. Akcin, “Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller” Selcuk Üniversitesi Yayınları 43, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 8, pp. 307–367, 1988.
[2] E. Ceyhan, “Determination of Some Agricultural Characters and Their Heredity Though Line x Tester Method in Pea Parents and Crosses”, Selcuk University, Gradutate School of Natural and Applied Science, Ph.D. Thesis, pp. 103, 2003 (Tr).
[3] E. Ce yhan, and M.A. Avci, “Combining Ability and Heterosis for Grain Yield and Some Yield Components in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”, Pakistan J Bio. Sci., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1447-1452, 2005.
[4] E. Ceyhan, M.A. Avci, and K.E. MCPhee, “The Determination of Grain Yield and Some Agronomical Characters as Winter Cultivation of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes in Konya Ecological Conditions”, S.U. Zir. Fak. Der., vol. 19, no. 37, pp. 6-12, 2005.
[5] E. Ceyhan, M.A. Avcı and S.Karadaş, “Line x Tester Analysis in Pea (Pisum sativum L.):Identification of Superior Parents for Seed Yield and Its Components”, African J. Bio., vol. 7, no. 16, pp.2810-2817, 2008.
[6] E. Ceyhan, A. Kahraman, M.K. Ates, and S. Karadaş, “Stability Analysis on Seed Yield and Its Components in Peas”, Bulgarian J. Agri. Sci., vol. 18, pp. 887-893, 2012.
[7] M. Öz, and A. Karasu, “Bazı Bezelye (Pisum sativum L) Çeşitlerinin Tohum Verimi ve Verim Komponentlerinin Belirlenmesi”, SDU Zir. Fak. Der., vol. 5, no. 1, pp.44-49, 2010.
[8] G. Demirci, and S. Unver, “The Effects of Different Sowing Time on Yield and Yield Components in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Ankara Conditions”, Anadolu J AARI, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2005.
[9] T.N. Khan, A. Ramzan, G. Jillani and T. Mehmood, “Morphological Performance of Peas (Pisum sativum) Genotypes Under Rainfed Conditions of Potowar Region”, J. Agric. Res., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 51-60, 2013.
[10] M. Avci, and E. Ceyhan, “Determination of Some Agricultural Characters of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes”, JAVA, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 798-802, 2013.
[11] M. Önder, and E. Ceyhan, “Relations Among Seed Yield and Some Morphological Characteristics of Pea Cultivars(Pisum sativum L.) Sown in Various Sowing Dates Under Central Anatolian”, S.Ü. Zir. Fak. Der., vol. 15, no. 25, pp. 173-183, 2001.
[12] M.I. Ashraf, M.A. Pervez, M. Amjad, R. Ahmad, and M. Ayub, “Qualitative and Quantitative Response of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars to Judicious Applications of Irrigation with Phosphorus and Potassium”, Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 159-164, 2011.
[13] T. Nleya, and J. Rickertsen, “Seeding Rate and Variety Effects on Yield Yield Components and Economic Return of Field Pea in the Northern Great Plains”, http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/ research/2011/pea/ (05.07.2013), 2011.
[14] V. Kosev, and A. Mikic, “Assessing Relationships Between Seed Yield Components in Spring-Sown Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars in Bulgaria by Correlation and Path Analysis”, Span J Agric Res., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1075-1080, 2012.
[15] Ö. Alan, and H. Geren, “Bezelye’de (Pisum sativum L.) Farklı Ekim Zamanlarının Tane Verimi ve Diğer Bazı Tarımsal Özellikler Üzerine Etkisi” Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 127-134, 2012..
[16] K.E. McPhee, and F.J., Muehlbauer, “Biomass Production and Related Characters in the Core Collection of Pisum germpasm” Gen. Res. and Crop Evo., vol. 48, pp. 195-203, 2001.
[17] A. Rasaei, M.E. Ghobadi and M. Ghobadi, “Effect of Supplemental Irrigation and Plant Density on Yield and Yield Components of Peas (Pisum sativum L.) in Kermanshah Region American”, Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 352-357, 2012.
[18] M.J. Santalla, M. Amurrio and A.M. De Ron, “Food and Feed Potential Breeding Value of Green Dry and Vegetable Pea Germplasm”, Can. J. Plant Sci., vol. 81, pp. 601-610, 2001.
[19] J.D. Singh, and I.P. Singh, “Selection Parameters for Seed Yield in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”, Nat. J. Plant Improvement, 6(1):51-52, 2004.
Vol:13 No:09 2019Vol:13 No:08 2019Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007