Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 31176


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10011666
Communication Styles of Business Students: A Comparison of Four National Cultures
Abstract:
Culturally diverse global companies need to understand cultural differences between leaders and employees from different backgrounds. Communication is culturally contingent and has a significant impact on effective execution of leadership goals. The awareness of cultural variations related to communication and interactions will help leaders modify their own behavior, and consequently improve the execution of goals and avoid unnecessary faux pas. Our focus is on young adults that have experienced cultural integration, culturally diverse surroundings in schools and universities, and cultural travels. Our central research problem is to understand the impact of different national cultures on communication. We focus on four countries with distinct national cultures and spatial distribution. The countries are Finland, Indonesia, Russia and USA. Our sample is based on business students (n = 225) from various backgrounds in the four countries. Their responses of communication and leadership styles were analyzed using ANOVA and post-hoc test. Results indicate that culture impacts on communication behavior. Even young culturally-exposed adults with cultural awareness and experience demonstrate cultural differences in their behavior. Apparently, culture is a deeply seated trait that cannot be completely neutralized by environmental variables. Our study offers valuable input for leadership training programs and for expatriates when recognizing specific differences on leaders’ behavior due to culture.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] E.T. Hall. Beyond Culture. NY: Anchor Doubleday, 1977.
[2] L.A. Samovar, R.E. Porter, & E.R. McDaniel. Communication between Cultures. 8th ed. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2012.
[3] S.P. Huntington “The west unique, not universal”. Foreign Affairs, 28, 1996.
[4] H, Triandis. Culture and Social Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[5] A.A. Kedrowicz. “The impact of a group communication course on veterinary medical students' perceptions of communication competence and communication apprehension”, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 43(1), 1-8, 2016.
[6] X. Dai. “Intersubjectivity and interculturality: A conceptual link”, China Media Research, 6(1), 12-19, 2010.
[7] X. Dai & Chen, G. M. “On interculturality and intercultural communication competence”, China Media Research, 11(3), 100-114, 2015.
[8] M.E. Porter & N. Nohria. “How CEOs manage time”. Harvard Business Review, July-August 2018.
[9] G. Hofstede. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. London: Harper Collins Business. 1994
[10] Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G.J. (2005). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Rev. 2nded.).New York: McGraw-Hill.
[11] G. Hofstede. “The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1339-46, 2010.
[12] V. Gupta & P.J. Hanges. Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures. In J. S. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (pp. 178-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
[13] R. House, P. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. Dorfman & V. Gupta. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 societies. Sage. Thousand Oaks, 2004.
[14] P.M Leonardi & C. Rodriguez-Lluesma. “Occupational stereotypes, perceived status differences, and intercultural communication in global organizations” Communication Monographs, 80(4), 478-502, 2013.
[15] J.N. Martin & T.K. Nakayama. Intercultural Communication in Contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2013.
[16] H.S. Park, T.R. Levine, R. Weber, H.E. Lee, L.I. Terra, I.C. Botero, & M.S.Wilson. “Individual and cultural variations in direct communication style”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36 (2), 179-187, 2012.
[17] P.B. Smith. Communication styles as dimensions of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 216-233, 2011.
[18] A.C., Woestenkuehler, H. Steinmetz, M.C., Wehner & R. Kabst. Does national culture explain differences in organizational communication? A multilevel analysis. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015 (1), p. 12429, 2015.
[19] J.Chhokar, F. Brodbeck & R. House. Culture and Leadership across the World: the GLOBE Book of In-depth Studies of 25 Societies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2007.
[20] GLOBE Project. Global Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness. https://globeproject.com/, 2020.
[21] D. Iranwanto. “An analysis of national culture and leadership practices in Indonesia”, Journal of Diversity Management. 4 (2), 2009.
[22] Ceicdata. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/russia/gdp-per-capita, 2020.
[23] A. Alekseev, S. Panteleyev, D. Golodayev, A. Savina, S. Kryzhevskaya, & A.Vasina. “Features of the modern Russian management style”, The Scientific and Methodical Electronic Journal, 2016.
[24] T. Brandt & P. Uusi-Kakkuri. Transformational leadership and communication style of Finnish CEOs. Communication Research Reports, 33 (2), 119-127, 2016.
Vol:15 No:04 2021Vol:15 No:03 2021Vol:15 No:02 2021Vol:15 No:01 2021
Vol:14 No:12 2020Vol:14 No:11 2020Vol:14 No:10 2020Vol:14 No:09 2020Vol:14 No:08 2020Vol:14 No:07 2020Vol:14 No:06 2020Vol:14 No:05 2020Vol:14 No:04 2020Vol:14 No:03 2020Vol:14 No:02 2020Vol:14 No:01 2020
Vol:13 No:12 2019Vol:13 No:11 2019Vol:13 No:10 2019Vol:13 No:09 2019Vol:13 No:08 2019Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007