Comparative Effect of Self-Myofascial Release as a Warm-Up Exercise on Functional Fitness of Young Adults
Warm-up is an essential component for optimizing performance in various sports before a physical fitness training session. This study investigated the immediate comparative effect of Self-Myofascial Release through vibration rolling (VR), non-vibration rolling (NVR), and static stretching as a part of a warm-up treatment on the functional fitness of young adults. Functional fitness is a classification of training that prepares the body for real-life movements and activities. For the present study 20male physical education students were selected as subjects. The age of the subjects was ranged from 20-25 years. The functional fitness variables undertaken in the present study were flexibility, muscle strength, agility, static and dynamic balance of the lower extremity. Each of the three warm-up protocol was administered on consecutive days, i.e. 24 hr time gap and all tests were administered in the morning. The mean and SD were used as descriptive statistics. The significance of statistical differences among the groups was measured by applying ‘F’-test, and to find out the exact location of difference, Post Hoc Test (Least Significant Difference) was applied. It was found from the study that only flexibility showed significant difference among three types of warm-up exercise. The observed result depicted that VR has more impact on myofascial release in flexibility in comparison with NVR and stretching as a part of warm-up exercise as ‘p’ value was less than 0.05. In the present study, within the three means of warm-up exercises, vibration roller showed better mean difference in terms of NVR, and static stretching exercise on functional fitness of young physical education practitioners, although the results were found insignificant in case of muscle strength, agility, static and dynamic balance of the lower extremity. These findings suggest that sports professionals and coaches may take VR into account for designing more efficient and effective pre-performance routine for long term to improve exercise performances. VR has high potential to interpret into an on-field practical application means.
 Buchman A, Boyle P, Wilson R, Bienias J, Bennett D. Physical activity and motor decline in older persons. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35(3):354–362.
 Verghese J, Lipton RB, Hall CB, et al. Abnormality of gait as a predictor of non-Alzheimer's dementia. 2002;347:1761–8.
 Hesseberg K, Bentzen H, Ranhoff AH, et al. Physical fitness in older people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.2016;24:92–100.
 Brach JS, Simonsick EM, Kritchevsky S, Yaffe K, Newman AB. The association between physical function and lifestyle activity and exercise in the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:502–9.
 Durstine JL, Gordon B, Wang Z, Luo X. Chronic disease and the link to physical activity. J Sport Health Sci. 2013;2:3–11.
 Peterson MJ, Giuliani C, Morey MC, Pieper CF, Evenson KR, Mercer V, et al. Physical activity as a preventative factor for frailty: the health, aging, and body composition study. J Gerontol A BiolSci Med Sci. 2009; 64: 61–8.
 Ota S, Goto H, Fujita R, Haruta M, Noda Y, Tamakoshi K. Application of pole walking to day service centers for use by community-dwelling frail elderly people. Int J Gerontol. 2014; 8:6–11.
 Schleicher MM, Wedam L, Wu G. Review of Tai Chi as an effective exercise on falls prevention in elderly. Res Sports Med. 2012; 20: 37–58.
 Shellock FG, Prentice WE. Warming-up and stretching for improved physical performance and prevention of sports-related injuries. Sports Med 1985; 2 (4): 267-79.
 Safran MR, Seaber AV, Garrett Jr WE. Warm-up and muscular injury prevention: an update. Sports Med 1989; 8 (4): 239-50.
 Bishop D. Performance changes following active warm up and how to structure the warm up. Sports Med 2003; 33 (7): 483-98.
 McKardle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition, and human performance. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea &Febiger, 1991.
 Agre JC. Hamstring injuries. Proposed aetiological factors, prevention, and treatment. Sports Med 1985; 2 (1): 21-33.
 Myofascial Release. (n.d.) Segen's Medical Dictionary. (2011).
 Peacock C. A., Krein D. D., Silver T. A., Sanders G. J. & von Carlowitz K. A. (2014). An acute bout of self-myofascial release in the form of foam rolling improves performance testing. International Journal of Exercise Science 7(3), 202-211.
 MacDonald G., Penney M., Mullaley M., Cuconato A., Drake C., Behm D. G. & Button D. C. (2013) An acute bout of self myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force. Journal of Strength and Conditioning, 27(3), 812-821.
 Sullivan KM Silvey DB Button DC, et al. Roller massager application to the hamstrings increases sit and reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports PhysTher. 2013;8(3):228236.
 Macdonald GZ Button DC Drinkwater EJ, et al. Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense bout of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(1):131142.
 Pearcey GE Bradbury Squires DJ Kawamoto JE, et al. Foam rolling for delayed onset muscle soreness and recovery of dynamic performance measures. J Athl Train. 2015;50(1):513.
 Healey KC Hatfield DL Blanpied P, et al. The effects of myofascial release with foam rolling on performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(1):61‐68.
 Sullivan KM, Silvey DB, Button DC, Behm DG. Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports PhysTher 2013;8:228-36. 10.
 Sefton J. (2004). Myofascial release for athletic trainers, Part 1: theory and session guidelines. Human Kinetics 9(1), 48-49.
 Sullivan KM, Behm DG, Power KE, Button DC. Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. J Athl Train 2015;50:133-40.