Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 30162


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10009967
Dao Embodied – Embodying Dao: The Body as Locus of Personal Cultivation in Ancient Daoist and Confucian Philosophy
Abstract:
This paper compares ancient Daoist and Confucian approaches to the human body as a locus for learning, edification or personal cultivation. While pointing out some major differences between ancient Chinese and mainstream Western visions of the body, it seeks at the same time inspiration in some seminal Western phenomenological and post-structuralist writings, in particular from Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Pierre Bourdieu. By clarifying the somewhat dissimilar scopes of foci found in Daoist and Confucian philosophies with regard to the role of and attitude to the body, the conclusion is nevertheless that their approaches are comparable, and that both traditions take the physical body to play a vital role in the cultivation of excellence. Lastly, it will be argued that cosmological underpinnings prevent the Confucian li from being rigid and invariable and that it rather emerges as a flexible learning device to train through active embodiment a refined sensibility for one’s cultural environment.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] R.R. Wang, Yinyang. The Way of Heaven and Earth in Chinese Thought and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 81.
[2] Laozi 老子, in Laozi Zhuangzi zhijie 老子莊子直解, annot. Chen Qinghui 陳慶惠, Hangzhou: Zhejiang wenyi chubanshe, 1998.
[3] M. Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, transl. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968, p. 139.
[4] R. Vallier, “The Elemental Flesh. Nature, Life, and Difference in Merleau-Ponty and Plato’s Timaeus,” in Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy. Transforming the Tradition, B. Flynn, W.J. Froman and R. Vallier, eds. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009, p. 131.
[5] B. Thorsteinsson, “Flesh and différance – Derrida and Merleau-Ponty,” in Corporeity and Affectivity: Dedicated to Maurice Merleau-Ponty, K. Novotný, P. Rodrigo, J. Slatman and S. Stoller, eds. Leiden: Brill, 2014, pp. 251-260.
[6] M. Richir, “Savage Mind, Society and History,” in Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy. Transforming the Tradition, p. 70.
[7] Zhuangzi 莊子, A Concordance to Chuang Tzu, Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series. Supplement no. 20. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956, 60/22/78.
[8] J. Legge, Li Chi. Book of Rites (2 vols.). New York: University Books Inc., 1967, vol. 1, p. 11.
[9] Zou Changlin 鄒昌林, Zhonggguo li wenhua 中國禮文化. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2000, p. 329.
[10] Ge Rongjin 葛榮晉, Zhongguo zhexue fanchou tonglun 中國哲學範疇通論. Beijing: Shoudu shifan daxue chubanshe, 2001, pp. 566 and 703.
[11] Zhang Dainian 張岱年, Key Concepts in Chinese Philosophy, transl. E. Ryden. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press/New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002, p. xvii.
[12] Liu Shu-hsien, Understanding Confucian Philosophy. Classical and Sung-Ming. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1998.
[13] Chen Jingpan, Confucius as a Teacher - Philosophy of Confucius with Special Reference to Its Educational Implications. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1990, p. 249.
[14] C. Bell, Ritual. Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 150.
[15] G. Sigurðsson, “Li 禮, Ritual and Pedagogy: A Cross-Cultural Exploration,” Sophia. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics 51:2 (2012), pp. 227-242.
[16] G. Sigurðsson, Confucian Propriety and Ritual Learning. A Philosophical Interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2015.
[17] D.L. Hall and R.T. Ames, Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987, p. 87.
[18] L. Vandermeersch, Etudes sinologiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994, p. 144.
[19] Mencius 孟子. A Concordance to the Meng Tzu, Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series. Supplement no. 17. Taipei: Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center, Inc., 1966, 7A.14.
[20] Xu Shen 許慎, Shuowen jiezi jinshi 說文解字今釋. Changsha: Yuelu shushe, 2001, p. 1220.
[21] P. Bourdieu, The Logic of Practice, transl. R. Nice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990, p. 52.
[22] R. Jenkins, Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge, 2002, p. 75.
[23] Lunyu 論語. A Concordance to the Analects of Confucius, Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series. Supplement no. 16. Taipei: Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center, Inc., 1966, 16.13.
[24] J. Legge, The Chinese Classics (5 vols.). Taipei: SMC Publishing, Inc., 1998-2000, pp. 379-381.
[25] Gou Chengyi 勾承益, Xianqin Lixue 先秦禮學. Chengdu: Bashu shuhui chuban faxing, 2002, p. 193.
[26] D. Sommer, “Concepts of the Body in the Zhuangzi,” in Experimental Essays on Zhuangzi, V.H. Mair, ed. Dunedin: Three Pines Press, 2010, p. 213.
[27] Liezi 列子, The Book of Lieh-tzu. A Classic of Tao, transl. A.C. Graham. London: Mandala, 1990, p. 36.
[28] H.-G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. 6th ed. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1990, p. 16.

Vol:13 No:12 2019Vol:13 No:11 2019Vol:13 No:10 2019Vol:13 No:09 2019Vol:13 No:08 2019Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007