Effects of Different Fiber Orientations on the Shear Strength Performance of Composite Adhesive Joints
A composite material with carbon fiber and polymer
matrix has been used as adherent for manufacturing adhesive joints.
In order to evaluate different fiber orientations on joint performance,
the adherents with the 0°, ±15°, ±30°, ±45° fiber orientations were
used in the single lap joint configuration. The joints with an overlap
length of 25 mm were prepared according to the ASTM 1002
specifications and subjected to tensile loadings. The structural
adhesive used was a two-part epoxy to be cured at 70°C for an hour.
First, mechanical behaviors of the adherents were measured using
three point bending test. In the test, considerations were given to
stress to failure and elastic modulus. The results were compared with
theoretical ones using rule of mixture. Then, the joints were
manufactured in a specially prepared jig, after a proper surface
preparation. Experimental results showed that the fiber orientations
of the adherents affected the joint performance considerably; the
joints with ±45° adherents experienced the worst shear strength, half
of those with 0° adherents, and in general, there was a great
relationship between the fiber orientations and failure mechanisms.
Delamination problems were observed for many joints, which were
thought to be due to peel effects at the ends of the overlap. It was
proved that the surface preparation applied to the adherent surface
was adequate. For further explanation of the results, a numerical
work should be carried out using a possible non-linear analysis.
 R.F. Gibson, Principles of Composite Materials Mechanics, New York:
McGrew-Hill, Inc. 1994.
 A.K. Kaw, Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd edition, New York:
Taylor & Francois Group, 2006.
 F.L. Mathews, and T.T. Tester, “The influence of stacking sequence on
the strength of bonded CFRP single lap joints”, International Journal of
Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 5 (1), 1985), p. 13.
 F. Mortensen and O.T. Thomsen, “Coupling effects in adhesive bonded
joints”, Composite Structures, vol. 56 (2), 2002, p. 165.
 W.C. de Goeij, M.J.L. van Tooren and A. Beukers, “Composite adhesive
joints under cyclic loading”, Materials & Design, vol. 20 (5), 1999, p.
 M.D. Banea and L.F.M. da Silva, “Adhesively bonded joints in
composite materials: an overview”, J. Materials: Design and
Applications, vol. 223, 2009, p. 1.
 L. Jianfeng, Y. Ying, Z. Taotao and L Zudian,” Experimental study of
adhesively bonded CFRP joints subjected to tensile loads”, International
Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 57, 2015. p. 95.
 M.M. Abdel Wahab, “Fatigue in adhesively bonded joints: A Review”,
ISRN Materials Science, vol. 2012, 2012 p. 1.
 J.A.M. Ferreira, P.N. Reis, J.D.M. Costa and M.O.W. Richardson,
“Fatigue behaviour of composite adhesive lap joints”, Composites
Science and Technology vol. 62, 2002, p. 1373.
 B. Haghpanah, S. Chiu, and A. Vaziri, “Adhesively bonded lap joints
with extreme interface geometry”, International Journal of Adhesion
and Adhesives, vol. 48, 2014, p. 130.
 X. Jiang, M.H. Kolstein and F.S.K. Bijlaard, “Experimental and
numerical study on mechanical behavior of an adhesively-bonded joint
of FRP–steel composite bridge under shear loading”, Composite
structures, vol. 108, 2014, p. 387.
 Hysol® EA 9394, Henkel.
 Standard test method for flexural properties of unreinforced and
reinforced plastics and electrical insulating material: ASTM D792
 Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single lap joint
adhesively bonded specimens: ASTM 1002.