Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 29978


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
10010168
Effects of Intercropping Maize (Zea mays L.) with Jack Beans (Canavalia ensiformis L.) at Different Spacing and Weeding Regimes on Crops Productivity
Abstract:
A field experiment was conducted at Ido town in Ido Local Government Area of Oyo state, Nigeria to determine the effects of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) with Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis L.) at different spacing and weeding regimes on crops productivity. The treatments were 2 x 2 x 3 factorial arrangement involving two spatial crop arrangements. Spacing of 75 cm x 50 cm and 90 cm x 42 cm (41.667 cm) with two plants per stand resulted in plant population of approximately 53,000 plants/hectare. Also, Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two cropping patterns (sole and intercrop), three weeding regimes (weedy check, weeds once, and weed twice) with three replicates was used. Data were analyzed with SAS (Statistical Analysis System) and statistical means separated using Least Significant Difference (LSD) (P ≤ 0.05). Intercropping and crop spacing did not have significant influence on the growth parameters and yield parameters. The maize grain yield of 1.11 t/ha obtained under sole maize was comparable to 1.05 t/ha from maize/jack beans. Weeding regime significantly influenced growth and yields of maize in intercropping with Jack beans. Weeding twice resulted in significantly higher growth than that of the other weeding regimes. Plant height at 6 Weeks After Sowing (WAS) under weeding twice regime (3 and 6 WAS) was 83.9 cm which was significantly different from 67.75 cm and 53.47 cm for weeding once (3 WAS) and no weeding regimes respectively. Moreover, maize grain yield of 1.3 t/ha obtained from plots weeded twice was comparable to that of 1.23 t/ha from single weeding and both were significantly higher than 0.71 t/ha maize grain yield obtained from the no weeding control. The dry matter production of Jack beans reduced at some growth stages due to intercropping of maize with Jack beans though with no significance effect on the other growth parameters of the crop. There was no effect on the growth parameters of Jack beans in maize/jack beans intercrop based on cropping spacing while comparable growth and dry matter production in Jack beans were produced in maize/Jack beans mixture with single weeding.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:

[1] Agegnehu, G., Ghisaw, A. and Sinebo, W. (2010). Yield potential and land use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy Sust Development 28: 257-263.
[2] Akobundu, I.O. (1987). Weed science in the tropics; Principles and practices. John Waley and son Chichester, New York; 522pp.
[3] Ajala, S.O., A. Menkir and J.G.King (1999).Fertilizer requirement of open-pollinated and hybrid maize genotype. Paper presented at Sasakawa global 2000 national maize workshop, ABU, Zaria, Nigeria.
[4] Annon, 2007; http://www.hdra.org.uk/ HDRA’s booklet, Green Manures, No. TGM2 Jack bean. Accessed on 22/05/2013.
[5] Beets, W.C. (1990). Raising and sustaining productivity of smallholder farming systems in the tropics. Alkmaar, Holland; AgBe Publishing.
[6] Carlini, C.R. and Gumaraes, I. (1981). Isolation and characterization of toxic protein from Canavalia ensiformis (Jack bean) seeds distinct from Con A. Toxicon 19: 667-675.
[7] Casal, J.J. and V.A. Deregibus (1985). Variation in tiller dynamics and morphology in Lolium multiflorum Lam. Vegetative and reproductive plants as affected by differences in red/far red irradiation. Annals of Botany V.56, p.533-559.
[8] Echo 2006 (Roland Bunch, 1985). Green manure crops, Echo technical note; http://echonet.org/ Accessed on 09/06/2013.
[9] Enyi, B.A.C. (1973). Effect of intercropping maize or sorghum with cowpeas, pigeon peas or beans. Exp. Agric. 9:83-90.
[10] FAO and ILO (1997). Maize in human nutrition intermediate level handbook. FAO and ILO Publication, Rome, Italy.
[11] Hartmann, H.T. Kofranet, A.M. Rubatzky, V.I. and Flocker, W.I. (1981). Plant science growth, development and utilization of cultivated plants (2nd Est.) Prentice-Hall, Inc. Simon and Schuelet, Englewood, New Jersey, Pp. 57-72.
[12] IITA (2007). Maize overview, http://www.iita.org/details/researchsummary.aspx/ Accessed on 24/06/2013.
[13] Lagoke, S.T.O. Chondhary A.H. and Yanko Y.M. (1981). Weed control in rainfall groundnut in the Guinea Savanna Zones of Nigeria. Weed Research (21):11-25.
[14] Lucas, E.O. (1981). The growth of two maize varieties in farmers’ plots located at two ecological zones in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science 26: 1017-1022.
[15] Mukhtar, A.M. and Suhair, M.E. (2013). Critical Period of Weed Interference in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in Dongola Locality, Northern State, Sudan. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, El Selaim, Dongola University-Sudan.
[16] Odetokun, S.M. (2000). Effect of fermentation on physiochemical properties, anti-nutrient and in-vitro multi-enzymes digestibility of selected legumes. PhD thesis, Chemistry Department, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria.
[17] Okonkwo, J.C. and Udedibie, A.B.I. (1991). Preliminary observations on the yield performance of Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) and Sword bean (Canavalia gladiata) in the Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Paper presented at the 27th annual Conference of Agricultural Society of Nigeria, Minna, Nigeria. 1-4 September 1991.
[18] Richner, W., Sangakkara, U.R., Schneider, M.K., and Stamp, P. (2003). Impact of intercropping beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and sunhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) on growth, yields and nitrogen uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in humid tropics during the minor rainy season. Maydica 48 (2003): 233-238.
[19] Rouannent, G. (1987). The tropical agriculturist Ed: Macmillan Publisher Ltd, Malaysia, 102p.
[20] Shehu,Y., Alhassan, W.S. and Phillips, C.J.C. (1997). The effect of intercropping maize with Stylosanthes hamata at different row spacings on grain and fodder yields and chemical composition. Tropical Grasslands (1997) Volume 31, 227–231.
[21] Tsubo, M. Walker, S. Ogindo, H.O. (2005). A simulation model of cereal-legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions.Model Application. Field Crop Research. 93: 23-33.
[22] USDA, (2005). United State Department of Agriculture (USDA), Canavalia ensiformis (L) DC. Germplasm Resources Information Network, 2005.
[23] Vesterager, J.M., N.E., Nielsen, and H. Hogh-Jensen (2008). Effects of cropping history and Phosphorus source on yield and Nitrogen fixation insole and intercropped cowpea-maize systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 80(1); 61-73.
[24] Wahua, T.A.T. (1983). Nutrient uptake by intercropped maize and cowpeas and a concept of nutrient supplementation index (NSI). Exp. Agric. 19:263-275.
[25] Yilmaz, F., Atak, M., and Erayman, M. (2007). Identification of advantages of maize-legume intercropping over Solitary Cropping through Competition Indices in the East Mediterranean Region. Turk Journal Agric For.32 (2008); pp. 111-119.
Vol:13 No:09 2019Vol:13 No:08 2019Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007