The problem of soil stabilization has been one of the important issues in geotechnical engineering. Nowadays, nanomaterials have revolutionized many industries. In this research, improvement of the Kerman fine-grained soil by nanozeolite and nanobentonite additives separately has been investigated using Atterberg Limits and unconfined compression test. In unconfined compression test, the samples were prepared with 3, 5 and 7% nano additives, with 1, 7 and 28 days curing time with strain control method. Finally, the effect of different percentages of nanozeolite and nanobentonite on the geotechnical behavior and characteristics of Kerman fine-grained soil was investigated. The results showed that with increasing the amount of nanozeolite and also nanobentonite to fine-grained soil, the soil exhibits more compression strength. So that by adding 7% nanozeolite and nanobentonite with 1 day curing, the unconfined compression strength is 1.18 and 2.1 times higher than the unstabilized soil. In addition, the failure strain decreases in samples containing nanozeolite, whereas it increases in the presence of nanobentonite. Increasing the percentage of nanozeolite and nanobentonite also increased the elasticity modulus of soil.
 Zhang, G. (2007). “Soil nanoparticles and their influence on engineering properties of soils,”. In Advances in Measurement and Modeling of Soil Behavior (pp. 1-13).
 Lambe, T. W., & Whitman, R. V. (1969). Soil mechanics, 553 pp.
 Ghazi, H., Baziar, M. H., & Mirkazemi, S. M. (2011, May). The effects of nano-material additives on the basic properties of soil. In Proc. of 14th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Hong-Kong (pp. 23-27).
 Kananizadeh, N., Ebadi, T., Khoshniat, S. A., & Mousavirizi, S. E. (2011). The positive effects of nanoclay on the hydraulic conductivity of compacted Kahrizak clay permeated with landfill leachate. Clean–Soil, Air, Water, 39(7), 605-611.
 Mohammadi, M., & Niazian, M. (2013). Investigation of nano-clay effect on geotechnical properties of Rasht clay. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res, 3, 37-46.
 Firoozi, A. A., Taha, M. R., Firoozi, A. A., & Khan, T. A. (2014). Assessment of nano-zeolite on soil properties. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(19), 292-295.
 Hareesh, P., & Vinothkumar, R. (2016). Assessment of nano materials on Geotechnical properties of Clayey soils hareesh vinothkumar. International Conference on Engineering Innovations and Solutions(ICEIS – 2016), 66-71.
 Wei, D., Dave, R., & Pfeffer, R. (2002). Mixing and characterization of nanosized powders: an assessment of different techniques. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4(1-2), 21-41.
 Majdi, M., Orumiei, A., and Nikudel, M. R., (2004), "Investigation of mechanical behavior of nanosilica and nanokaolinite produced from mechanical method", Fifth International Congeress of Nanotechnology (ICNN2014), Tehran, Iran
 ASTM D12: 4318-87, “Standard test method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of soils”.
 ASTM, D 698-78. "Fundamental principles of soil compaction", American society for testing and materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2012).
 ASTM D 2166-87, “Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil”.
 Tabarsa, A., Latifi, N., Meehan, C. L., & Manahiloh, K. N. (2018). Laboratory investigation and field evaluation of loess improvement using nanoclay–A sustainable material for construction. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 454-463.
 Asakereh, A., & Avazeh, A. (2017). The Effects of Nano Clay on Dispersive Soils Behavior (Case Study of Minab City). Journal of Amirkabir university, 5 (3), 7-13, (In Persian).