Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 30458

Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
Measuring Innovative and Entrepreneurial Networks Performance
Nowadays innovation represents a challenge crucial to remaining globally competitive. This study seeks to develop a conceptual model aimed at measuring the dynamic interactions of the triple/quadruple helix, balancing innovation and entrepreneurship initiatives as pillars of regional competitiveness – the Regional Helix Scoreboard (RHS). To this aim, different strands of literature are identified according to their focus on specific regional competitiveness governance mechanisms. We put forward an overview of the state-of-the-art of research and is duly assessed in order to develop and propose a framework of analysis that enables an integrated approach in the context of collaborative dynamics. We conclude by presenting the RHS for the study of regional competitiveness dynamics, which integrates and associates different backgrounds and identifies a number of key performance indicators for research challenges.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):


[1] K. Gopalakrishnan, Y. Y. Yusuf, A. Musa, T. Abubakar, and H. M. Ambursa, “Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) Systems,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 193–203, 2012.
[2] L. Budd and K. Hirmisf, “Conceptual Framework for Regional Competitiveness,” Univ. Bus., vol. 3, no. December, pp. 1015–1028, 2004.
[3] Y. Jiang and J. Shen, “Measuring the urban competitiveness of Chinese cities in 2000,” Cities, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 307–314, Oct. 2010.
[4] Z. Acs and J. Amorós, “Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 561–574, 2015.
[5] D. B. Audretsch, A. N. Link, and I. Peña, “Economics of Innovation and New Technology Academic entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness: introduction to the special issue,” no. October, pp. 5–7, 2012.
[6] D. B. Audretsch and M. Keilbach, “Entrepreneurship and regional growth: An evolutionary interpretation,” J. Evol. Econ., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 605–616, 2004.
[7] S. Singhal, S. McGreal, and J. Berry, “Application of a hierarchical model for city competitiveness in cities of India,” Cities, vol. 2011, Jun. 2012.
[8] E. Commission, “European Competitiveness Report 2014: Helping Firms Grow,” Belgium, 2014.
[9] B. T. Asheim and L. Coenen, “Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters,” Res. Policy, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1173–1190, 2005.
[10] B. T. Asheim, O. Ejermo, and A. Rickne, “When is Regional ‘Beautiful’? Implications for Knowledge Flows, Entrepreneurship and Innovation,” Ind. Innov., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2009.
[11] B. T. Asheim, H. L. H. Smith, and C. Oughton, “Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy,” Reg. Stud., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 875–891, 2011.
[12] A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for visonairies, Game Changers and Challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010.
[13] M. E. Porter and S. Stern, “Innovation: Location Matters,” MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 28–36, 2001.
[14] P. K. Wong, Y. P. Ho, and E. Autio, “Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 335–350, Apr. 2005.
[15] M. Nordqvist and L. Melin, “Entrepreneurial families and family firms,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 22, no. 3–4, pp. 211–239, 2010.
[16] R. Huggins, H. Izushi, D. Prokop, and P. Thompson, “Regional competitiveness, economic growth and stages of development*,” Zb. Rad. Ekon. Fak. u Rijeka, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 255–283, 2014.
[17] L. Budd and A. Hirmis, “Conceptual Framework for Regional Competitiveness,” Reg. Stud., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1015–1028, 2004.
[18] H. Lawton Smith and S. Bagchi-Sen, “The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 24, no. 5–6, pp. 383–404, 2012.
[19] R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School, 2001.
[20] P. Chytas, M. Glykas, and G. Valiris, “A proactive balanced scorecard,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 460–468, Oct. 2011.
[21] S. Dror, “The Balanced Scorecard versus quality award models as strategic frameworks,” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 583–593, Jun. 2008.
[22] G. K. Kanji and P. M. e Sá, “Kanji’s Business Scorecard,” Total Qual. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–27, Jan. 2002.
[23] V. Lazzarotti, R. Manzini, and L. Mari, “A model for R&D performance measurement,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 212–223, Nov. 2011.
[24] P. Mendes, A. C. Santos, F. Perna, and M. Ribau Teixeira, “The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 24, pp. 20–29, Mar. 2012.
[25] S. Philbin, “Process model for university-industry research collaboration,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 488–521, 2008.
[26] H. Sundin, M. Granlund, and D. A. Brown, Balancing Multiple Competing Objectives with a Balanced Scorecard, no. June 2012. 2009.
[27] J. Taylor and C. Baines, “Performance management in UK universities: implementing the Balanced Scorecard,” J. High. Educ. Policy Manag., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 111–124, 2012.
[28] N. G. Theriou, E. Demitriades, and P. Chatzoglou, “A proposed framework for integrating the balanced scorecard into the strategic management process,” Oper. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 147–165, May 2004.
[29] M.-L. Tseng, “Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard,” Comput. Educ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 188–201, Aug. 2010.
[30] M.-J. Verdecho, J.-J. Alfaro-Saiz, R. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, and A. Ortiz-Bas, “The analytic network process for managing inter-enterprise collaboration: A case study in a collaborative enterprise network,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 626–637, Jan. 2012.
[31] I.-L. Wu and C.-H. Chang, “Using the balanced scorecard in assessing the performance of e-SCM diffusion: A multi-stage perspective,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 474–485, Jan. 2012.
[32] A. Al-Ashaab, M. Flores, A. Doultsinou, and A. Magyar, “A balanced scorecard for measuring the impact of industry–university collaboration,” Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 22, no. 5–6, pp. 554–570, Jul. 2011.
[33] G. Ioppolo, G. Saija, and R. Salomone, “Developing a Territory Balanced Scorecard approach to manage projects for local development: Two case studies,” Land use policy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 629–640, Jul. 2012.
[34] K. Semlinger, “Cooperation and competition in network governance: regional networks in a globalised economy,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 547–560, Nov. 2008.
[35] N. Arranz and J. C. Fdez. de Arroyabe, “The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms,” Technovation, vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 88–100, Jan. 2008.
[36] Y. Awazu, “Managing technology alliances: The case for knowledge management,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 484–493, Dec. 2006.
[37] A. Al-ashaab, M. Flores, A. Doultsinou, and A. Magyar, “A balanced scorecard for measuring the impact of industry – university collaboration,” Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 22, no. 5–6, pp. 554–570, 2011.
[38] H. Etzkowitz, The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action, 1st ed. Oxon: Routledge, 2008.
[39] H. Etzkowitz, “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations,” Soc. Sci. Inf., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 293–337, Sep. 2003.
[40] H. Etzkowitz, J. M. C. de Mello, and M. Almeida, “Towards ‘meta-innovation’ in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix,” Res. Policy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 411–424, May 2005.
[41] H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘“Mode 2”’ to a Triple Helix of university – industry – government relations,” Sci. Technol., pp. 109–123, 2000.
[42] L. Leydesdorff and M. Fritsch, “Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics,” Res. Policy, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1538–1553, Dec. 2006.
[43] A. Hira, “Mapping out the Triple Helix: how institutional coordination for competitiveness is achieved in the global wine industry,” Prometheus, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 271–303, 2013.
[44] M. Ozman, “Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature,” Econ. Innov. New Technol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–67, Jan. 2009.
[45] L. Leydesdorff, W. Dolfsma, and G. Vanderpanne, “Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among ‘technology, organization, and territory,’” Res. Policy, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 181–199, 2006.
[46] L. Leydesdorff and M. Meyer, “Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systemsIntroduction to the special issue,” Res. Policy, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1441–1449, Dec. 2006.
[47] E. Nissan, M.-Á. Galindo Martín, and M.-T. Méndez Picazo, “Relationship between organizations, institutions, entrepreneurship and economic growth process,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 311–324, Jun. 2011.
[48] L. Farinha, J. Ferreira, and B. Gouveia, “Networks of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Triple Helix Case Study,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 259–275, 2016.
[49] H. L. Smith and S. Bagchi‐Sen, “University–Industry Interactions: the Case of the UK Biotech Industry,” Ind. Innov., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 371–392, 2006.
[50] E. Salvador, “Are science parks and incubators good ‘brand names’ for spin-offs? The case study of Turin,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 203–232, Feb. 2010.
[51] Y. Kim, W. Kim, and T. Yang, “The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S.,” Res. Policy, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 154–166, Feb. 2012.
[52] Y. Kim, W. Kim, and T. Yang, “The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S.,” Res. Policy, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 154–166, Feb. 2012.
[53] L. Leydesdorff, “The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2012.
[54] S. P. MacGregor, P. Marques-Gou, and A. Simon-Villar, “Gauging Readiness for the Quadruple Helix: A Study of 16 European Organizations,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 173–190, Jul. 2010.
[55] D. B. Audretsch, M. Belitski, and S. Desai, “Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities,” Ann. Reg. Sci., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 33–60, 2015.
[56] D. B. Audretsch, A. N. Link, and I. Peña, “Academic entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness: introduction to the special issue,” Econ. Innov. New Technol., vol. 21, no. 5–6, pp. 427–428, 2012.
[57] D. B. Audretsch and M. Keilbach, “Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth,” Ann. Reg. Sci., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 457–469, 2005.
[58] M. Kitson, R. Martin, and P. Tyler, “Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept?,” Reg. Stud., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 991–999, Dec. 2004.
[59] D. J. Kelley, S. Singer, and M. Herrington, “The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011 Global Report,” 2011.
[60] H. Lawton Smith, J. Glasson, and A. Chadwick, “The geography of talent: entrepreneurship and local economic development in Oxfordshire,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 449–478, 2005.
[61] M. Nordqvist and L. Melin, “Entrepreneurial families and family firms,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 22, no. 3–4, pp. 211–239, May 2010.
[62] B. Van Looy, P. Landoni, J. Callaert, B. van Pottelsberghe, E. Sapsalis, and K. Debackere, “Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs,” Res. Policy, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 553–564, May 2011.
[63] E. G. Carayannis, T. D. Barth, and D. F. Campbell, “The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation,” J. Innov. Entrep., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, 2012.
[64] A. Bernasconi, “University entrepreneurship in a developing country: The case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000,” High. Educ., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 247–274, Sep. 2005.
[65] Y. Kim, W. Kim, and T. Yang, “The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S.,” Res. Policy, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 154–166, 2012.
[66] A. Bernasconi, “University entrepreneurship in a developing country: The case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000,” High. Educ., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 247–274, 2005.
[67] R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, “Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I,” Account. Horizons, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87–104, Mar. 2001.
[68] P. D’Este and M. Perkmann, “Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 316–339, Feb. 2010.
[69] J. J. Alfaro, R. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, M. J. Verdecho, and A. Ortiz, “Business process interoperability and collaborative performance measurement,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 877–889, Sep. 2009.
[70] M.-J. Verdecho, J.-J. Alfaro-Saiz, and R. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, “Prioritization and management of inter-enterprise collaborative performance,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 142–153, Apr. 2012.
[71] R. Stanley, K. a Lillis, S. J. Zuspan, R. Lichenstein, R. M. Ruddy, M. J. Gerardi, and J. M. Dean, “Development and implementation of a performance measure tool in an academic pediatric research network.,” Contemp. Clin. Trials, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 429–37, Sep. 2010.
[72] H. S. B. Herath, W. G. Bremser, and J. G. Birnberg, “Joint selection of balanced scorecard targets and weights in a collaborative setting,” J. Account. Public Policy, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2010.
[73] M. Perkmann, A. Neely, and K. Walsh, “How should firms evaluate success in university-industry alliances? A performance measurement system,” R&D Manag., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 202–216, Mar. 2011.
[74] M.-J. Verdecho, J.-J. Alfaro-Saiz, R. Rodriguez-rodriguez, and A. Ortiz-bas, “A multi-criteria approach for managing inter-enterprise collaborative relationships,” Omega, vol. 40, pp. 249–263, 2012.
[75] R. Sternberg, “Do EU Regional Policies Favour Regional Entrepreneurship? Empirical Evidence from Spain and Germany,” Eur. Plan. Stud., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 583–608, 2012.
[76] European Commission, “Innovation Union Scoreboard,” Brussels, 2014.
[77] L. Farinha, J. J. Ferreira, and J. B. Gouveia, “Innovation and Competitiveness: A High-Tech Cluster Approach,” Rom. Rev. Precis. Mech. Opt. Mechatronics, vol. 45, pp. 41–48, 2014.
[78] I. Lengyel and J. Rechnitzer, “Drivers of Regional Competitiveness in the Central European Countries,” Transit. Stud. Rev., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 421–435, 2013.
[79] N. Čučković, K. Jurlin, and V. Vučković, “Measuring regional competitiveness: the case of Croatia,” Southeast Eur. Black Sea Stud., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 503–523, 2013.
[80] A. Balkyte and M. Tvaronavičiene, “Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: Facets of ‘sustainable competitiveness,’” J. Bus. Econ. Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 341–365, 2010.
[81] R. Viale and H. Etzkowitz, The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Tripla Helix of University-Industry-Government, 1st ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
Vol:14 No:06 2020Vol:14 No:05 2020Vol:14 No:04 2020Vol:14 No:03 2020Vol:14 No:02 2020Vol:14 No:01 2020
Vol:13 No:12 2019Vol:13 No:11 2019Vol:13 No:10 2019Vol:13 No:09 2019Vol:13 No:08 2019Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007