Open Science Research Excellence

Open Science Index

Commenced in January 2007 Frequency: Monthly Edition: International Publications Count: 30464


Select areas to restrict search in scientific publication database:
16340
Perceptions of Health Risks amongst Tertiary Education Students in Mauritius
Abstract:
A personal estimate of a health risk may not correspond to a scientific assessment of the health risk. Hence, there is a need to investigate perceived health risks in the public. In this study, a young, educated and healthy group of people from a tertiary institute were questioned about their health concerns. Ethics clearance was obtained and data was collected by means of a questionnaire. 362 students participated in the study. Tobacco use, heavy alcohol drinking, illicit drugs, unsafe sex and potential carcinogens were perceived to be the five greatest threats to health in this cohort. On the other hand natural health products, unemployment, unmet contraceptive needs, family violence and homelessness were felt to be the least perceived health risks. Nutrition-related health risks as well as health risks due to physical inactivity and obesity were not perceived as major health threats. Such a study of health perceptions may guide health promotion campaigns.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

References:


[1] World Health Organization, “The World Health Report 2002 - Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life,” WHO, 2002. Available at: www.who.int/whr/2002/en/
[2] A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science vol. 185, no. 4157: pp. 1124–1131, 1974.
[3] B. Fischhoff , P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read and B. Combs, “How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits,” Policy Sciences vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 127- 152, 1978.
[4] M. Douglas and A. Wildavsky, “ Risk and Culture: An essay on selection of technical and environmental dangers,” Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
[5] R. E. Kasperson, O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson and S. Ratick, “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework,” Risk Analysis vol. 8 no. 2, pp.177–187, 1988.
[6] L. Sjöberg, “Factors in risk perception,” Risk Analysis vol. 20 no.1, pp. 1-11, 2000.
[7] V.J. Strecher and I.M. Rosentock, “The health belief model,” in: Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice, eds. K. Glanz, F.M. Lewis, B.K. Rimer, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 41-59, 1997.
[8] N.T. Brewer, N.D. Weinstein, C.L. Cuite, J.E. Herrington, “Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behaviour,” Ann Behav Med vol. 27 no.2, pp.125–130, 2004.
[9] G. Menon, P. Raghubir and N. Agrawal, “Health risk perceptions and consumer psychology,” in: The Handbook of Consumer Psychology, eds. C. Haugtvedt, P. Herr and F. Kardes, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 981-1010, 2007.
[10] UNDP, “Sustainability and Equity: a better future for all,” Human development report, 2011. Available at: http://hdrstats.undp.org/images/explanations/MUS.pdf.
[11] A Global Look at Public Perceptions of Health Problems, Priorities, and Donors: The Kaiser/Pew Global Health Survey, 2007. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/files/pdf/259.pdf
[12] Central Statistics Office, “Deaths by cause, Republic of Mauritius, 2010,” Digest of Demographic Statistics, 2010. Available at: http://www.gov.mu/portal/ goc/cso/report/natacc/demo10/demo10.pdf.

Vol:14 No:06 2020Vol:14 No:05 2020Vol:14 No:04 2020Vol:14 No:03 2020Vol:14 No:02 2020Vol:14 No:01 2020
Vol:13 No:12 2019Vol:13 No:11 2019Vol:13 No:10 2019Vol:13 No:09 2019Vol:13 No:08 2019Vol:13 No:07 2019Vol:13 No:06 2019Vol:13 No:05 2019Vol:13 No:04 2019Vol:13 No:03 2019Vol:13 No:02 2019Vol:13 No:01 2019
Vol:12 No:12 2018Vol:12 No:11 2018Vol:12 No:10 2018Vol:12 No:09 2018Vol:12 No:08 2018Vol:12 No:07 2018Vol:12 No:06 2018Vol:12 No:05 2018Vol:12 No:04 2018Vol:12 No:03 2018Vol:12 No:02 2018Vol:12 No:01 2018
Vol:11 No:12 2017Vol:11 No:11 2017Vol:11 No:10 2017Vol:11 No:09 2017Vol:11 No:08 2017Vol:11 No:07 2017Vol:11 No:06 2017Vol:11 No:05 2017Vol:11 No:04 2017Vol:11 No:03 2017Vol:11 No:02 2017Vol:11 No:01 2017
Vol:10 No:12 2016Vol:10 No:11 2016Vol:10 No:10 2016Vol:10 No:09 2016Vol:10 No:08 2016Vol:10 No:07 2016Vol:10 No:06 2016Vol:10 No:05 2016Vol:10 No:04 2016Vol:10 No:03 2016Vol:10 No:02 2016Vol:10 No:01 2016
Vol:9 No:12 2015Vol:9 No:11 2015Vol:9 No:10 2015Vol:9 No:09 2015Vol:9 No:08 2015Vol:9 No:07 2015Vol:9 No:06 2015Vol:9 No:05 2015Vol:9 No:04 2015Vol:9 No:03 2015Vol:9 No:02 2015Vol:9 No:01 2015
Vol:8 No:12 2014Vol:8 No:11 2014Vol:8 No:10 2014Vol:8 No:09 2014Vol:8 No:08 2014Vol:8 No:07 2014Vol:8 No:06 2014Vol:8 No:05 2014Vol:8 No:04 2014Vol:8 No:03 2014Vol:8 No:02 2014Vol:8 No:01 2014
Vol:7 No:12 2013Vol:7 No:11 2013Vol:7 No:10 2013Vol:7 No:09 2013Vol:7 No:08 2013Vol:7 No:07 2013Vol:7 No:06 2013Vol:7 No:05 2013Vol:7 No:04 2013Vol:7 No:03 2013Vol:7 No:02 2013Vol:7 No:01 2013
Vol:6 No:12 2012Vol:6 No:11 2012Vol:6 No:10 2012Vol:6 No:09 2012Vol:6 No:08 2012Vol:6 No:07 2012Vol:6 No:06 2012Vol:6 No:05 2012Vol:6 No:04 2012Vol:6 No:03 2012Vol:6 No:02 2012Vol:6 No:01 2012
Vol:5 No:12 2011Vol:5 No:11 2011Vol:5 No:10 2011Vol:5 No:09 2011Vol:5 No:08 2011Vol:5 No:07 2011Vol:5 No:06 2011Vol:5 No:05 2011Vol:5 No:04 2011Vol:5 No:03 2011Vol:5 No:02 2011Vol:5 No:01 2011
Vol:4 No:12 2010Vol:4 No:11 2010Vol:4 No:10 2010Vol:4 No:09 2010Vol:4 No:08 2010Vol:4 No:07 2010Vol:4 No:06 2010Vol:4 No:05 2010Vol:4 No:04 2010Vol:4 No:03 2010Vol:4 No:02 2010Vol:4 No:01 2010
Vol:3 No:12 2009Vol:3 No:11 2009Vol:3 No:10 2009Vol:3 No:09 2009Vol:3 No:08 2009Vol:3 No:07 2009Vol:3 No:06 2009Vol:3 No:05 2009Vol:3 No:04 2009Vol:3 No:03 2009Vol:3 No:02 2009Vol:3 No:01 2009
Vol:2 No:12 2008Vol:2 No:11 2008Vol:2 No:10 2008Vol:2 No:09 2008Vol:2 No:08 2008Vol:2 No:07 2008Vol:2 No:06 2008Vol:2 No:05 2008Vol:2 No:04 2008Vol:2 No:03 2008Vol:2 No:02 2008Vol:2 No:01 2008
Vol:1 No:12 2007Vol:1 No:11 2007Vol:1 No:10 2007Vol:1 No:09 2007Vol:1 No:08 2007Vol:1 No:07 2007Vol:1 No:06 2007Vol:1 No:05 2007Vol:1 No:04 2007Vol:1 No:03 2007Vol:1 No:02 2007Vol:1 No:01 2007