School Architecture of the Future Supported by Evidence-Based Design and Design Patterns
Trends in education affect schooling, needing incorporation into design concepts to support desired learning processes with appropriate and stimulating environments. A design process for school architecture demands research, debates, reflections, and efficient decision-making methods. This paper presents research on evidence-based design, related to middle schools, based on a systematic literature review and the elaboration of a set of architectural design patterns, through a graphic translation of new concepts for classroom configurations, to support programming debates and the synthesis phase of design. The investigation resulted in nine patterns that configure the concepts of boundaries, flexibility, levels of openness, mindsets, neighborhoods, movement and interaction, territories, opportunities for learning, and sightlines for classrooms. The research is part of a continuous investigation of design methods, on contemporary school architecture to produce an architectural pattern matrix based on scientific information translated into an insightful graphic design language.
 Cleveland, B. (2018). Why Innovative Learning Environments? Stories from three schools that helped establish an ongoing space and pedagogy agenda. In School Space and Its Occupation Conceptualising and Evaluating Innovative Learning Environments (pp. 39–65).
 Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Cambridge, Mass., EUA: Oxford University Press.
 Menezes, A., & Lawson, B. (2006). How designers perceive sketches. Design Studies, 27(5), 571–585.
 de Souza, L. N. (2018). Arquitetura escolar, parâmetros de projeto e modalidades de aprendizagem (Master’s Dissertation). UNICAMP, FEC/ Departamento de Arquitetura e Construção, Campinas SP.
 Nair, P., Fielding, R., &Lackney, J. A. (2013). The Language of School Design: Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools. (3rd edition). Minneapolis, Minn.: Designshare, Inc.
 Lippman, Peter C. (2010). Evidence-Based Design of Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Responsive Approach to Creating Learning Environments (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.
 Lippman, P. C. (2003). Advancing Concepts about activity settings within learning environments (CAE Quarterly Newsletter). Washington, D.C., EUA: AIA Committee on Architecture for Education.
 Gombrich, E. H. OsUsos das imagens: estudossobre a função social da arte da comunicação visual. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2012.
 Jacobson, R. Information Design. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.
 Krum, R. Cool Infographics: Effective Communication with Data Visualization and Design. Indianapolis: Wiley, 2013.
 Lankow, J.; Ritchie, J.; Crooks, R. Infographics: The power of visual storytelling. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
 Laseau, P. Graphic thinking for architects & designers. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
 Malamed, C. Visual language for designers: principles for creating graphics that people understand. Rockport Pub, 2011.
 O’Grady, J. V.; O’Grady, K. V. The Information Design Handbook. Cincinnati: HOW Books, 2008.
 Pena, W. M.; Parshall, S. A. Problem seeking: An architectural programming primer. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
 Tufte, E. R. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire: Graphics press, 2005.
 White, E. T. Space adjacency analysis: diagramming information for architectural design. Architectural Media, 1986.
 Deliberador, M. S. (2016). Parâmetros da arquitetura escolar e o jogo de cartascomoferramenta de apoioaodesenvolvimento do programaarquitetônico (Doctoral Thesis, UNICAMP, FEC/ Departamento de Arquitetura e Construção).
 Kitchenham, B. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keel, UK: Technical report, EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, 2007.
 Da Silva Gonçalo, C. et al. Planejamento e execução de revisõessistemáticas da literatura. Brasília Med, BSBMédica, v. 49, n. 2, p. 104–110, 2012.
 Denyer, D., &Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational research Methods.
 Cleveland, B., Soccio, P., & Love, P. (2016). Learning environment evaluation and the development of school facility design guidelines. AARE Conference, 1–13. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
 Deed, C.; Lesko, T. ‘Unwalling’the classroom: teacher reaction and adaptation. Learning Environments Research, v. 18, n. 2, p. 217–231, 2015.
 Ito, Keiko; Yokoyama, Yurika. Relationship between classroom plan types and the degree of concentration of the children in elementary schools: A comparative study of open‐plan classrooms and conventional‐plan classrooms. Japan Architectural Review, 2018.
 Lippmann, P.; Elliott, J. Pattern Language Developed for Learning Communities of Practice. AIA, 2007.
 Mahat, M.; Bradbeer, C.; Byers, T.; et al. Innovative Learning Environments and Teacher Change: Defining key concepts - Technical Report 3/2018. (s.l.): University of Melbourne, LEaRN, 2018.
 Woodman, K. Re-Placing Flexibility: Flexibility in Learning Spaces and Learning. 2011. PHD, University dof Melbourne. 2011.
 Young, F., Cleveland, B. W., &Imms, W. (2019). The affordances of innovative learning environments for deep learning: Educators’ and architects’ perceptions. The Australian Educational Researcher.
 Byers, T.; Mahat, M.; Liu, K.; et al. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Learning Environments on Student Learning Outcomes - Technical Report 4/2018. (s.l.): University of Melbourne, LEaRN, 2018.
 Bissel, J. Teachers’ Construction and Use of Space. FORUM Journal, v. 46, n. 1, p. 28-32, 2004.