This paper explores how Critical Systems Thinking and Action Research can be used to improve student performance in Networking. When describing a system from a systems thinking perspective, the following aspects can be identified: the total system performance, the systems environment, the resources, the components and the management of the system. Following the history of system thinking we observe three emerged methodologies namely, hard systems, soft systems, and critical systems. This paper uses Critical Systems Thinking (CST) which describes systems in terms of contradictions and conflict. It demonstrates how CST can be used in an Action Research (AR) project to improve the performance of students. Intervention in terms of student assessment is discussed and the impact of the intervention is discussed.
 C. W. Churchman, The systems approach New York: Dell, 1968
 l. Von Bertalanffy, General system theory: Foundations, development,
applications, Revised ed., New York: Gearge Braziller, 1968.
 R. L. Baskerville. "Investigating information systems with action
research," 18 September 2011
 P. Checkland, "Autobiographical retrospectives: Learning your way to
ÔÇÿaction to improve- : The development of soft system thinking and soft
systems methodology," International journal of general systems, vol.
40(5), pp. 487-512 2011.
 M. C. Jackson, System methodology for the management sciences, New
York: Plenum, 1991.
 R. L. Flood, and M. C. Jackson, Critical system thinking, New York:
 B. Dahlbom, and L. Mathiassen, Computers in context: The philosophy
and practice of system design, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
 W. Ulrich, "Critical heuristics of social systems design," Critical system
thinking: Directed readings, R. L. Flood and M. C. Jackson, eds., pp.
103-116, Chichester: Wiley, 1987.